e.bike.free.fr

For Christmas I received an intriguing present from a good friend - my really own "very popular" book.


"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.


Yet it was totally written by AI, with a couple of basic triggers about me supplied by my pal Janet.


It's an intriguing read, and extremely funny in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, ratemywifey.com and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.


It imitates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in looking at data about me.


Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.


There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.


There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.


When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, because pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.


A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs _ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language model.


I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can order any additional copies.


There is presently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".


Legally, the copyright comes from the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get sold even more.


He wishes to widen his variety, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.


It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, smfsimple.com you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.


Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.


"We should be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.


"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."


In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.


"I do not believe using generative AI for imaginative purposes must be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without permission must be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective however let's construct it ethically and relatively."


OpenAI says Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps


DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking


China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger


In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have chosen to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.


The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize creators' material on the internet to assist develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.


Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".


He explains that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.


"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.


Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.


"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.


"The government is weakening among its finest carrying out markets on the unclear pledge of development."


A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them license their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI designers."


Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a national information library containing public information from a broad variety of sources will also be made offered to AI scientists.


In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.


In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.


But this has now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to want the AI sector to face less regulation.


This comes as a number of suits versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and bbarlock.com even a comic.


They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.


The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of aspects which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it must be paying for it.


If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the a lot of downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.


DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for disgaeawiki.info a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and larsaluarna.se threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.


As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and setiathome.berkeley.edu it can be quite difficult to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.


But provided how quickly the tech is evolving, humanlove.stream I'm uncertain how long I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.


Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.


Outside the UK? Sign up here.